Why Vista Had To Be Rebuilt From Scratch
This is hands-down the best article I have read on the Windows Vista disaster. I am glad to see that the people within Microsoft are dropping their archaic ways of thinking and learning to code in much better and more effective ways. As much as I am a proponent of Apple and OS X, I would love to see MSFT get their act together and offer a QUALITY alternative. People should have a choice and if these changes pull through and Windows is for once a decent product, then everyone will have to be on top of their game to deliver the best products possible. The winners will end up being the consumers. And THAT is how it should be in ANY industry.
[ via OSViews.com ]
Why Vista Had To Be Rebuilt From Scratch:
The Wall Street Journal has a long front-page article describing how Jim Allchin approached Bill Gates in July, 2004, with the news that then-Longhorn, now-Vista, was 'so complex that its writers would never be able to make it run properly.'
Also, the article says, 'Throughout its history, Microsoft had let thousands of programmers each produce their own piece of computer code, then stitched it together into one sprawling program. Now, Mr. Allchin argued, the jig was up. Microsoft needed to start over.' And start over they did. The article is astonishing for its frank comments from the principles, including Allchin and Gates, as well as for its description of Microsoft's cowboy spaghetti code culture.







Comments
Couldn't agree with you more. Competition is good - and anything that increases competition is good.
Besides, I have to use Windows a fair bit and I'd love a version that comes closer to my Mac's reliability :)
Posted by: Ian Betteridge | September 27, 2005 6:28 AM